π¨ Palette: λΉ λλ ν 리 μνμ μ κ·Όμ± κ°μ - #603
π¨ Palette: λΉ λλ ν 리 μνμ μ κ·Όμ± κ°μ #603seonghobae wants to merge 3 commits into
Conversation
π‘ What: λΉ λλ ν 리 λ©μμ§ μμμμ `role="status"` μμ±μ μ κ±°νμ΅λλ€. π― Why: μ μ μΌλ‘ λ λλ§λ μμμ λΌμ΄λΈ 리μ μν (role="status")μ λΆμ¬νλ©΄, νμ΄μ§ λ‘λ μ μ€ν¬λ¦° 리λκ° μ€λ³΅ν΄μ μλ΄νκ±°λ μ½κΈ° νλ¦μ λ°©ν΄νλ μ κ·Όμ± μν° ν¨ν΄μ΄κΈ° λλ¬Έμ λλ€. πΈ Before/After: μκ°μ μΈ λ³νλ μμ΅λλ€ (μ€ν¬λ¦° 리λ κ²½νλ§ κ°μ λ¨). βΏ Accessibility: μ€ν¬λ¦° 리λ μ¬μ©μκ° λΉ λλ ν 리 μ§μ μ λ μ΄μ μ€λ³΅λκ±°λ νΌλμ€λ¬μ΄ μλ΄ λ©μμ§λ₯Ό λ°μ§ μκ² λ©λλ€.
|
π Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a π emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. π βΉοΈ Recent review infoβοΈ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Team Run ID: π Files selected for processing (4)
π€ Files with no reviewable changes (1)
Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review. π WalkthroughWalkthroughμ μ μΌλ‘ λ λλ§λλ λΉ λλ ν 리 λ©μμ§μμ ChangesλΉ λλ ν 리 μ κ·Όμ± λ§ν¬μ μ‘°μ
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes Merge Risk: βͺ Minimal Β· up to Empty-directory messages retain their visible text while no longer being announced as a live status region on initial page load. The targeted markup and test expectation are aligned, with no remaining merge-readiness risk identified. π₯ Pre-merge checks | β 4 | β 1β Failed checks (1 warning)
β Passed checks (4 passed)
Full details: Docstring CoverageExplanation Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 2 functions across 2 files. (1 skipped: 1 unsupported.)
β¨ Finishing Touches π‘ 1π Generate docstrings π‘
π§ͺ Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
|
||
| if(l.isEmpty()){ | ||
| l.append(""" <li><div class="empty-dir" role="status"><span class="icon" aria-hidden="true">📂</span> <span>μ΄ λλ ν 리λ λΉμ΄ μμ΅λλ€.</span></div></li>""") | ||
| l.append(""" <li><div class="empty-dir"><span class="icon" aria-hidden="true">📂</span> <span>μ΄ λλ ν 리λ λΉμ΄ μμ΅λλ€.</span></div></li>""") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
π Static-status contract remains stale
The readability contract still requires role="status", while the renamed behavior removes it. The test name also preserves the obsolete contract.
Was this helpful? React with π or π to provide feedback.
π‘ What: λΉ λλ ν 리 λ©μμ§ μμμμ `role="status"` μμ±μ μ κ±°νμ΅λλ€. π― Why: μ μ μΌλ‘ λ λλ§λ μμμ λΌμ΄λΈ 리μ μν (role="status")μ λΆμ¬νλ©΄, νμ΄μ§ λ‘λ μ μ€ν¬λ¦° 리λκ° μ€λ³΅ν΄μ μλ΄νκ±°λ μ½κΈ° νλ¦μ λ°©ν΄νλ μ κ·Όμ± μν° ν¨ν΄μ΄κΈ° λλ¬Έμ λλ€. πΈ Before/After: μκ°μ μΈ λ³νλ μμ΅λλ€ (μ€ν¬λ¦° 리λ κ²½νλ§ κ°μ λ¨). βΏ Accessibility: μ€ν¬λ¦° 리λ μ¬μ©μκ° λΉ λλ ν 리 μ§μ μ λ μ΄μ μ€λ³΅λκ±°λ νΌλμ€λ¬μ΄ μλ΄ λ©μμ§λ₯Ό λ°μ§ μκ² λ©λλ€.
π‘ What: λΉ λλ ν 리 λ©μμ§ μμμμ `role="status"` μμ±μ μ κ±°νμ΅λλ€. π― Why: μ μ μΌλ‘ λ λλ§λ μμμ λΌμ΄λΈ 리μ μν (role="status")μ λΆμ¬νλ©΄, νμ΄μ§ λ‘λ μ μ€ν¬λ¦° 리λκ° μ€λ³΅ν΄μ μλ΄νκ±°λ μ½κΈ° νλ¦μ λ°©ν΄νλ μ κ·Όμ± μν° ν¨ν΄μ΄κΈ° λλ¬Έμ λλ€. πΈ Before/After: μκ°μ μΈ λ³νλ μμ΅λλ€ (μ€ν¬λ¦° 리λ κ²½νλ§ κ°μ λ¨). βΏ Accessibility: μ€ν¬λ¦° 리λ μ¬μ©μκ° λΉ λλ ν 리 μ§μ μ λ μ΄μ μ€λ³΅λκ±°λ νΌλμ€λ¬μ΄ μλ΄ λ©μμ§λ₯Ό λ°μ§ μκ² λ©λλ€.
Verified successor: #590 (
e5ba27ec8f29ec7be857bb93b80c0a3452e0a458) contains the same product change and the same two structural regressions: static empty-directory text remains visible,role="status"is removed, and list/icon semantics stay intact. #590 also repaired branch contamination and deliberately rejected the unverified cross-screen-reader claim that staticrole="status"universally causes duplicate/interrupted announcements. The only delta unique to this PR is that over-broad.jules/palette.mdrule, which is not valid product/test/contract evidence and should not be inherited. All valid semantic/test delta is therefore fully preserved by #590; close this duplicate rather than maintaining two writers for the same change.